PV8Illustrative sample · not a real site
Investment / CZ / EUR

Comparable proposal worksheet

Compare adjusted scope and unit costs before choosing; a lower total is not proof of a better proposal.

Proposal A: adjusted investment€108,000EUR
Proposal A: adjusted unit cost€1,080EUR/kWp
Proposal A: common-basis NPV€-4,169.8EUR
Proposal B: adjusted investment€104,000EUR
Proposal B: adjusted unit cost€1,040EUR/kWp
Proposal B: common-basis NPV€-169.8EUR
Proposal A€108,000 EUR
Quoted price plus your excluded-scope allowance
Proposal B€104,000 EUR
Quoted price plus your excluded-scope allowance

Before you progress

  • Request written confirmation of excluded work and recurring fees.
  • Compare equipment, roof scope, warranties and generation evidence.
Assumptions & limits
  • Manually normalised solar proposals; allowances are user scenarios, not supplier quotations. No PDF extraction.
  • Inputs are unverified. EUR only; no automatic currency conversion or jurisdiction-specific entitlement is inferred.
  • Allowances are scenarios, not supplier prices. Equipment quality, warranty and contract scope are not inferred.
  • Both proposals use the entered common yield and blended energy value with constant cash flows; roof geometry, self-consumption differences, degradation and taxes are not modelled.
Inputs used in this assessment
Proposal A quoted investment96000.0 EUR
A: allowance for excluded scope12000.0 EUR
A: solar capacity100.0 kWp
Proposal B quoted investment104000.0 EUR
B: allowance for excluded scope0.0 EUR
B: solar capacity100.0 kWp
Common net yield assumption1050.0 kWh/kWp
Common blended electricity value120.0 EUR/MWh
A: annual operating costs1200.0 EUR/year
B: annual operating costs1200.0 EUR/year
Assessment term15.0 years
Discount rate7.0 %

Visitor-entered scenario assumptions · PV8 bounded scenario screening · PV8 shared finance core
Model: partner-scenarios-v2 · Reference: 3add4dff67fd